AQAR 20-21 Supporting Files

Criterion 2

Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.1.1 Enrolment of Students
2.1.2 Number of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per the reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats)
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1 The institution assesses students learning levels and organises special programmes for both slow and advanced learners
2.2.2 Student - Teacher (full-time) ratio
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process
2.3.1 Student-centric methods such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
2.3.2 Teachers use ICT-enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning
2.3.3 Ratio of students to mentor for academic and other related issues
2.3.4 Preparation and adherence to Academic Calendar and Teaching Plans by the institution
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1 Number of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year
2.4.2 Number of full-time teachers with PhD/ D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Super-Specialty / DSc / DLitt during the year
2.4.3 Total teaching experience of full-time teachers in the same institution
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1 Number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the year
2.5.2 Number of students complaints/grievances against evaluation against the total number who appeared in the examinations during the year
2.5.3 IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) have brought in considerable improvement in the Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1 Programme Outcomes and Course Outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on the website and communicated to teachers and students
2.6.2 Attainment of Programme Outcomes and Course Outcomes as evaluated by the institution
2.6.3 Pass Percentage of students
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1 Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS)

Criterion 3

Metric.No. Key Indicator -3.1 promotion of Research and Facilities
3.1.1 The institution's research facilities are frequently updated and there is a well-defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented
3.1.2 The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research
3.1.3 Number of teachers who were awarded national / international fellowship(s) for advanced studies/research during the year
Metric.No. Key Indicator-3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
3.2.1 Grants received from Government and Non-Governmental agencies for research projects, endowments, Chairs during the year (INR in Lakhs)
3.2.2 Number of teachers having research projects during the year
3.2.3 Number of teachers recognised as research guides
3.2.4 Number of departments having research projects funded by Government and Non-Government agencies during the year
Metric.No. Key Indicator-3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
3.3.1 Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and creation and transfer of knowledge supported by dedicated centres for research, entrepreneurship, community orientation, incubation, etc.
3.3.2 Number of workshops/seminars conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Entrepreneurship and Skill Development during the year
Metric.No. Key Indicators-3.4 Research Publications and Awards
3.4.1 The Institution ensures implementation of its Code of Ethics for Research uploaded in the website through the following:
1.Inclusion of Research Ethics in the research methodology course work
2.Ethics Committee
3.Plagiarism check through authenticated software
4.Research Advisory Committee view document
3.4.2 Number of Ph.D candidates registered per teacher (as per the data given with regard to recognized PhD guides/ supervisors provided in Metric No. 3.2.3) during the year
3.4.3 Number of research papers per teacher in CARE Journals notified on UGC website during the year
3.4.4 Number of books and chapters in edited volumes / books published per teacher during the year
3.4.5 Bibliometrics of the publications during the year based on average Citation Index in Scopus/ Web of Science/Pub Med
3.4.6 Bibliometrics of the publications during the year based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-Index of the University
Metric.No. Key Indicators-3.5 Consultancy
3.5.1 Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during the year(INR in lakhs)
3.5.2 Total amount spent on developing facilities, training teachers and clerical/project staff for undertaking consultancy during the year
Metric.No. Key Indicators-3.6 Extension Activities
3.6.1 Extension activities carried out in the neighbourhood sensitising students to social issues for their holistic development, and the impact thereof during the year
3.6.2 Number of awards and recognition received by the Institution, its teachers and students for extension activities from Government / Government-recognised bodies during the year
3.6.3 Number of extension and outreach programmes conducted by the institution through NSS/NCC during the year
3.6.4 Number of students participating in extension activities listed in 3.6.3 during the year
Metric.No. Key Indicators-3.7 Collaboration
3.7.1 Number of collaborative activities during the year for research/ faculty exchange/ student exchange/ internship/ on-the-job training/ project work
3.7.2 Number of functional MoUs with institutions of national and/or international importance, other universities, industries, corporate houses, etc. during the year (only functional MoUs with ongoing activities to be considered)

Criterion 4

Metric.No. Key Indicator - 4.1 Physical Facilities
4.1.1 The institution has adequate facilities for teaching - learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment, etc
4.1.2 The institution has adequate facilities for sports, games (indoor, outdoor),gymnasium, yoga centre etc., and cultural activities
4.1.3 Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT - enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS, etc
4.1.4 Average percentage of budget allocation, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation during the last five years
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
4.2.1 Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS)
4.2.2 Does the institution have the following? 1.e-journals 2.e-ShodhSindhu 3.Shodhganga Membership 4.e-books 5.Databases 6.Remote access to e-resources
4.2.3 Average annual expenditure for purchase of books and journals during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
4.2.4 Usage of library by teachers and students (footfalls and login data for online access)
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 4.3 IT Infrastructure
4.3.1 Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi
4.3.2 Student - Computer ratio
4.3.3 Available bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution
4.3.4 Facilities for e-content development such as Media Centre, Recording facility, Lecture Capturing System (LCS)
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
4.4.1 Average Expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, as a percentage during the last five years
4.4.2 There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.

Criterion 5

Metric.No. Key Indicator - 5.1 STUDENT SUPPORT
5.1.1 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government during the last five year.
5.1.2 Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships, freeships, etc. provided by the institution and non-government agencies during the last five years.
5.1.3 Following Capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organised for improving students capability.
5.1.4 Average percentage of students benefited by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the institution during the last five years
5.1.5 The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 5.2 STUDENT PROGRESSION
5.2.1 Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years.
5.2.2 Percentage of student progression to higher education (previous graduating batch)
5.2.3 Average percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations during the last five years
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 5.3 STUDENT PARTICIPATION AND ACTIVITIES
5.3.1 Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at inter-university / state /national / international events (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years
5.3.2 Presence of an active Student Council & representation of students on academic & administrative bodies/committees of the institution
5.3.3 Average number of sports and cultural events / competitions organised by the institution per year
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 5.4 ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT
5.4.1 The Alumni Association/Chapters (registered and functional) contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and other support services
5.4.2 Alumni financial contribution during the last five years (in INR)

Criterion 6

Metric.No. Key Indicator - 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
6.1.1 The governance of the institution is reflective of an effective leadership in tune with the vision and mission of the Institution
6.1.2 The effective leadership is reflected in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
6.2.1 The institutional Strategic/ Perspective plan is effectively deployed
6.2.2 The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
6.2.3 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1 The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/ progression
6.3.2 Teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies
6.3.3 Number of professional development / administrative training programmes organized by the Institution for its teaching and non-teaching staff
6.3.4 Teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III and V)
6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources
Metric.No. Key Indicator - 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes visible in terms ofIncremental improvements with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles)
6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms
6.5.3 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution